Skip to main content
· 9/7/2001

Ivan Beslic v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Citations

  • 265 F.3d 568
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 19787
  • 2001 WL 1027917

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “it is questionable whether [a void-for-vagueness] challenge 13 to an admissibility statute would be cognizable”
  • “[I]t is doubtful that an alien has a right to bring [a vagueness] challenge to an admissibility statute.” (discussing Boutilier v. I.N.S., 387 U.S. 118, 123–24 (1967))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ripple, Manion, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.