Itzkovitch v. Whitaker
Citations
- 115 La. 480
- 39 So. 499
- 1905 La. LEXIS 684
Syllabus
<p>1. Injunction — Protection oe Personal Rights.</p> <p>The civil courts have jurisdiction in injunction proceedings instituted to protect a personal right.</p> <p>2. Same — Picture in Rogues’ Gallery.</p> <p>A rule nisi was issued and preliminary injunction granted on the allegations of the petition. The court upon the allegations decided that, if facts were as alleged, injunction should be issued, and it follows that in that case it should be made perpetual.</p> <p>3. Same — Evidence.</p> <p>The case may be heard on the merits, in order that it may be decided after having heard testimony.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing Title II transportation regulations, which plaintiffs here characterize as “analogous” to 28 C.F.R. § 35.151(b), see Pl. Mem. at 21, under Roberts.
- involving one subway station; defendant did not contest whether the renovation constituted an “alteration” under the ADA
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.