Skip to main content
· 4/20/1995

ITT Electro-Optical Products Division of ITT Corp. v. Electronic Technology Corp.

Citations

  • 161 F.R.D. 228
  • 32 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1166
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6794

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that some district courts have held that precedential value alone renders issue “controlling” but disagreeing with that view and holding it to be only a factor
  • observing that some district courts have held that precedential value alone renders issue “controlling” but disagreeing with that view and holding it to be only a factor
  • observing that some district courts have held that precedential value alone renders issue “controlling” but disagreeing with that view and holding it to be only a factor
  • “An immediate appeal is considered to advance the ultimate termination of the litigation if that ‘appeal promises to advance the time for trial or to shorten the time required for trial.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Neiman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.