Skip to main content
· 8/19/1983

Itri v. Equibank, N.A.

Citations

  • 464 A.2d 1336
  • 318 Pa. Super. 268
  • 1983 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3750

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • interpreting section 1692k to provide concurrent jurisdiction in federal and state courts for FDCPA claims
  • holding state courts have concurrent jurisdiction over FDCPA claims
  • claims under the FDCPA are not restricted to federal forums
  • claims under the FDCPA are not restricted to federal forums
  • Fair Debt Collection Practices Act provides for concurrent jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rowley, Popovich, Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.