Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[P]roof of conduct violative of the Sherman Act is proof sufficient to establish a violation of the North Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act.”
• “[P]roof of conduct violative of the Sherman Act is proof sufficient to establish a violation of the North Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act.”
• “Absent some reason to believe that the [NCUDTPA] is an attempt directly to regulate interstate commerce . . . we perceive no cause for constitutional concern.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).