I.T.A.D. Associates, Inc. v. Podar Brothers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he attachment obtained by I.T.A.D. and the superseding bond posted by Podar are contrary to the parties’ agreement to arbitrate and the Convention[.]”
• \[T]he attachment obtained by I.T.A.D. and the superseding bond posted by Podar are contrary to the parties' agreement to arbitrate and the Convention[.]\
• “[T]he attachment obtained by I.T.A.D. and the superseding bond posted by Podar are contrary to the parties’ agreement to arbitrate and the Convention[,]”
• “[O]ur interpretation of the Article II(3) proviso must not only observe the strong policy favoring arbitration, but must also foster the adoption of standards which can be uniformly applied on an international scale.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).