Skip to main content
· 4/13/2000

Istre v. Apfel

Citations

  • 208 F.3d 517
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 6725
  • 2000 WL 328359

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a sentence-four remand must include a substantive ruling affirming, modifying, or reversing the Secretary’s decision
  • holding that a sentence-four remand must include a substantive ruling affirming, modifying, or reversing the Secretary’s decision
  • holding that a sentence-four remand must include a substantive ruling affirming, modifying, or reversing the Secretary’s decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Hall, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.