Issen v. GSC Enterprisers, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \the election of GSC directors accomplished by the assertedly deficient proxies was not causally related to the loans to certain directors\ that caused the loss
• holding that the effect of litigating a 13(d) violation through 16(b) would amount to a barred 10(b) litigation against those who aided and abetted accounting fraud, subverting the PSLRA and the Supreme Court’s prohibition against aiding and abetting violations under 10(b)
• \Common questions include . . . the duty to disclose[.]\
• \Common questions include . . . the duty to disclose[.]\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).