Israel v. CHABRA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]hen a . . . clause purportedly conflicts with another clause in a contract, every attempt should be made to harmonize the two provisions using common-law tools of contract interpretation.” (quoting Israel v. Chabra, 12 N.Y.3d 158, 167 (2009)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mission Measurement Corp. v. Blackbaud, Inc.
  E.D. Illinois· 2017-12-13· cited 26×
• Bulldog New York LLC v. Pepsico, Inc.
  D. Connecticut· 2014-03-31· cited 13×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Adler v. Pataki
  Second Circuit· 1999-07-20· cited 159×
• Bier Pension Plan Trust v. Estate of Schneierson
  New York Court of Appeals· 1989-10-19· cited 64×
• White Rose Food v. Saleh
  New York Court of Appeals· 2003-02-18· cited 57×
• Israel v. Chabra
  Second Circuit· 2008-08-05· cited 28×
• Israel v. Chabra
  New York Court of Appeals· 2009-03-26· cited 28×
• Unnamed case
  Second Circuit· 2005-01-04· cited 25×
• Louis Dreyfus Energy Corp. v. MG Refining & Marketing, Inc.
  New York Court of Appeals· 2004-06-08· cited 13×
• Crossland Federal Savings Bank Ex Rel. Federal Deposit Insurance v. A. Suna & Co.
  E.D. New York· 1996-06-13· cited 12×
• Republic National Bank v. Haddad
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1986-07-31· cited 6×
• Israel v. Chabra
  New York Court of Appeals· 2008-09-02· cited 1×