Israel Discount Bank Ltd. v. Robert M. Entin, Alexander Halberstein and Kan Rap, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• comparing the essential factual allegations made in the first and second suits
• comparing the essential factual allegations made in the first and second suits
• “In this analysis, a court should compare the factual issues explored in the first action with the factual issues to be resolved in the second action.”
• defendants “do not have any rights to indemnity ... under the FCA”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).