Skip to main content
· 5/25/1976

Israel-British Bank (London) Ltd. v. Federal Deposit Insurance

Citations

  • 536 F.2d 509
  • 8 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 766
  • 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 8859
  • 2 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 730

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an official used \means beyond\ his authority \by threatening [the plaintiff] with criminal charges instead of attempting to dismiss him for cause\
  • holding that an official used “means beyond” his authority “by threatening [the plaintiff] with criminal charges instead of attempting to dismiss him for cause”
  • recognizing the distinction between claims of federal employees for which remedies are available and employee claims which are not cognizable under the administrative process
  • to state Fifth Amendment due process claim, plaintiff must allege deprivation of property or liberty interest
  • and in Missouri, Kreutz v. Wolff, 560 S.W.2d 271 (Mo.App.1977)
  • same principle in a Bivens action by a federal employee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Friendly, Gurfein, Mulligan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.