Isra Fruit Ltd., Plaintiff-Respondent v. Agrexco Agricultural Export Company Limited and Agrexco (u.s.a.) Ltd., Defendants-Petitioners

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the federal statute (on which 4 V.I.C. § 33(c) is based
• denying certification where determination on appeal would result in no “appreciable saving of time”
• declining to take interlocutory appeal of order certified by district court
• appellate court expects that lower court will \normally” elaborate why question presented is considered \controlling”
• “strongly suggest[ing] to district judges the advisability of stating more than a bare finding that the statutory requirements of 1292(b) have been met”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).