Isom v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that documents including defendant's pleadings of nobo contendere to a DUI and of guilty to another DUI, along with the complaint, were sufficient to establish prior convictions
• citation and plea are sufficient evidence of conviction; complaint, plea, and sentence are sufficient evidence of conviction
• citation and plea are sufficient evidence of conviction; complaint, plea, and sentence are sufficient evidence of conviction
• citation and plea are sufficient evidence of conviction; complaint, plea, and sentence are sufficient evidence of conviction
• documents including defendant’s pleadings of nolo 27 contendere to one offense and guilty to another, along with the complaint, were sufficient 28 to establish prior convictions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Votava
  Washington Supreme Court· 2003-04-17· cited 38×
• Barnier v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2003-04-28· cited 25×
• Snyder v. Viani
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1996-05-09· cited 13×
• English v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2000-08-24· cited 12×
• Anderson v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1993-12-22· cited 10×
• State, Department of Motor Vehicles v. Torres
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1989-09-28· cited 6×
• Polson v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1992-12-11· cited 4×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Zavala
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-06-07· cited 41×
• Thomas v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-04-12· cited 39×
• State v. Sanford
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1954-10-05· cited 21×
• Rogers v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1989-05-18· cited 14×
• Bullock v. Dept. of Motor Vehicles
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1989-06-02· cited 5×