Island Portfolio Services, LLC v. De Jesus Santiago, Nilda R

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that to prove a conspiracy, the plaintiff 5 must demonstrate that each participant shared the “conspiratorial objective” of violating 6 the plaintiff’s constitutional rights
• “The mere fact that a conspiracy is alleged ... will not defeat an adequately supported motion for summary judgment”
• to allege a conspiracy, the plaintiff must bring forward plausible factual allegations showing an agreement or meeting of the minds to violate constitutional rights
• “To prove a conspiracy between private parties and the government under § 1983, an agreement or ‘meeting of the minds’ to violate constitutional rights must be shown.”
• “A private party may be considered to have acted under color of state law when it engages in a conspiracy or acts in concert with state agents to deprive one’s constitutional rights.”
• “To prove a conspiracy between private parties and the government under § 1983, an agreement or ‘meeting of the minds’ to violate constitutional rights must be shown.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).