Islamic American Relief Agency v. Unidentified FBI Agents

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a Treasury Department employee was not subject to personal jurisdiction in the District of Columbia because it is “well-settled that this Court cannot assert jurisdiction over an individual defendant based on his actions taken pursuant to his employment”
• noting that 19 “it is well-settled that this Court cannot assert jurisdiction over an individual defendant based on his actions taken pursuant to his employment”
• distinguishing between restrictions on political contribution.s, which merit strict scrutiny, and charitable contributions, which do not
• finding Court of Federal Claims is proper forum for takings claim in suit challenging IEEPA blocking under APA
• upholding agency action under § 706(2) based on \both the classified and unclassified administrative record\ provided to the court
• finding no personal jurisdiction over defendant who lived and worked in Missouri where his sole contact with D.C. was employment by Internal Revenue Service, which is headquartered here

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).