ISKOS. v. Planning Bd. of Tp. of Livingston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an order will be affirmed on appeal, even though the judge gave the wrong reasons for it
• noting that an order will be affirmed on appeal if it is correct, even if aspects of the trial court’s reasoning are not adopted
• noting that trial court orders may be affirmed for different reasons than those the trial court recited
• noting that if the order of the trial court is valid, the fact that it is predicated upon a different basis will not stand in the way of its affirmance
• affirming an order or judgment on appeal if it is correct, even though the judge gave the wrong or different reasons for it
• noting the commonality and propriety of affirming a valid determination entered on an erroneous basis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).