Isidra Callejas v. Linda McMahon and Margaret Heckler, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Third Party

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “a ‘dispute or ambiguity, such as a split in the circuits, [is] an indication that a subsequent amendment is intended to clarify, rather than change, the existing’” meaning of a statute (alteration in original) (citation omitted)
• “[A] ‘dispute or ambiguity, such as a split in the circuits, [is] an indication that a subsequent amendment is intended to clarify, rather than change, the existing law.’” (second brackets in original) (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).