ISI Holdings Of TN, LLC v. Mount Pleasant Regional Planning Commission
Syllabus
This is an appeal from a successful petition for a writ of certiorari involving land use. The trial court ruled in favor of the petitioners after finding that the location approved for the proposed power station violated an applicable zoning ordinance. After the trial court's decision, the City of Mount Pleasant amended its ordinance to clarify that the zoning ordinance did not apply to public utilities. The City of Mount Pleasant Planning Commission thereafter approved the construction of the power station under the amended ordinance. The petitioners filed no writ of certiorari of the approval under the amended ordinance and therefore ask that this appeal be dismissed as moot. Because this case no longer serves to offer any meaningful relief to the parties and no exceptions to the mootness doctrine are present, we dismiss this appeal as moot.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- treating as preserved but declining to address “Archer’s alternative argument that third parties to the arbitration clause cannot enforce such an arbitration clause”
- clause requiring arbitration of disputes “except for actions seeking injunctive relief . . .” does not compel arbitration of equitable claims
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Presiding Judge J. Steven Stafford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.