Isenhart v. General Casualty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “An action for assault and battery would fall within this coverage unless, as [the insurer] asserts, coverage is precluded upon the ground that it would be contrary to public policy.”
• public policy prohibits, irrespective of insuring agreement, indemnity for “intentionally inflicted injuries”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).