S.D. Florida· 11/20/2006

Isbell v. Carnival Corp.

Citations

462 F. Supp. 2d 1232
2007 A.M.C. 677
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84452
2006 WL 3360382

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that Carnival Cruise Line did not have constructive notice of the possible danger of a passenger being bitten by a snake during an off-the-ship excursion in a rain forest where Carnival had no report of this ever happening before to one of its passengers
noting that there was “no testimony or evidence, other than Plaintiffs own personal opinion, that her damages resulted from” the alleged breach
presence of snakes in a river was an apparent and obvious danger for an excursion involving cave tubing in a rain forest river
defendant’s actual or constructive notice prerequisite to liability under cruise ship's duty to warn passengers of a dangerous condition
“The mere fact that an accident occurred does not give rise to a presumption of a dangerous condition.”
under federal maritime law, an operator of a cruise ship has a duty to warn of “known dangers which are not apparent and obvious”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moreno

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.