Skip to main content
· 8/31/2000

Isbell Ex Rel. Isbell v. Maricopa County

Citations

  • 9 P.3d 311
  • 198 Ariz. 280
  • 330 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 8
  • 2000 Ariz. LEXIS 84

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • county’s duty to maintain safe roadways was constant, and conflicting evidence raised triable issue of fact on whether county breached duty through specific conduct
  • \[A] plaintiff need not establish 'notice' if a government agency itself creates or causes the dangerous condition.\
  • county’s duty to maintain safe roadways was constant, and conflicting evidence raised triable issue of fact on whether county breached duty through specific conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGregor, Zlaket, Jones, Feldman, Martone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.