· 8/31/2000
Isbell Ex Rel. Isbell v. Maricopa County
Citations
- 9 P.3d 311
- 198 Ariz. 280
- 330 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 8
- 2000 Ariz. LEXIS 84
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- county’s duty to maintain safe roadways was constant, and conflicting evidence raised triable issue of fact on whether county breached duty through specific conduct
- \[A] plaintiff need not establish 'notice' if a government agency itself creates or causes the dangerous condition.\
- county’s duty to maintain safe roadways was constant, and conflicting evidence raised triable issue of fact on whether county breached duty through specific conduct
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McGregor, Zlaket, Jones, Feldman, Martone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.