Skip to main content
· 7/1/1860

Irwin's Administrator v. Brown's Executors

Citations

  • 35 Pa. 331

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • SEPTA not Commonwealth agency for purposes of provision giving Commonwealth Court exclusive jurisdiction over statewide agencies or in-strumentalities of state government
  • SEPTA not Commonwealth agency for purposes of provision giving Commonwealth Court exclusive jurisdiction over statewide agencies or instrumentalities of state government
  • SEPTA not a state agency within the original jurisdiction of the Commonwealth Court, but SEPTA and other transportation authorities are “independent agencies of the Commonwealth and part of its sovereignty” for other purposes
  • SEPTA not a state agency within the original jurisdiction of the Commonwealth Court, but SEPTA and other transportation authorities are \independent agencies of the Commonwealth and part of its sovereignty\ for other purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lowrie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.