Irwin v. Mascott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rule 14 “does not mean that the third-party defendant 1 must be liable to the original plaintiff.”
• noting added delay and complexity weigh against granting motion for 21 leave to file third-party complaint
• “Adding a [third-party] claim to this case would inject facts and legal issues which have nothing whatever to do with Plaintiffs’ claims . . . would prejudice Plaintiffs and certainly not save the court any time.”
• “For impleader to be permitted under Rule 14, the third-party plaintiffs claim must be dependent upon the outcome of the main claim.”
• no express or implied right to contribution or indemnification under Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
• no express or implied right to contribution or indemnification under FDCPA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Irwin v. Mascott
  N.D. California· 2000-08-31· cited 47×
• Zero Tolerance Entertainment, Inc. v. Ferguson
  C.D. California· 2008-10-10· cited 18×
• Helferich Patent Licensing, LLC v. Suns Legacy Partners, LLC
  D. Arizona· 2013-01-07· cited 14×
• Conner v. Howe
  S.D. Indiana· 2004-11-08· cited 12×
• McMillan v. Equifax Credit Information Services, Inc.
  D. Connecticut· 2001-07-13· cited 10×
• UL LLC v. Space Chariot Inc.
  C.D. California· 2017-04-20· cited 9×
• Brim v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
  N.D. Alabama· 2011-05-04· cited 8×
• Stephens v. Comenity, LLC
  D. Nevada· 2017-12-08· cited 7×
• Kerr v. Wanderer & Wanderer
  D. Nevada· 2002-12-31· cited 2×

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cort v. Ash
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-17· cited 3,337×
• Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Transport Workers Union
  Supreme Court· 1981-04-20· cited 806×
• Somportex Limited v. Philadelphia Chewing Gum Corporation v. Brewster, Leeds & Co., Inc. And M. S. International, Inc., Third-Party
  Third Circuit· 1972-03-27· cited 244×
• Aaron Fox Toni Fox, Husband and Wife v. Citicorp Credit Services, Inc., a South Dakota Corporation Jerold Kaplan Jane Doe Kaplan, Husband and Wife
  Ninth Circuit· 1994-02-01· cited 196×
• Kim v. Fujikawa
  Ninth Circuit· 1989-03-29· cited 130×
• Schroeder v. Busenhart
  Supreme Court· 1972-03-27· cited 128×
• Michael G. Schroyer Gail R. Schroyer v. Kenneth P. Frankel Gerald M. Smith Company, L.P.A., D/B/A Smith & Smith
  Sixth Circuit· 1999-12-02· cited 113×
• Newman v. Checkrite California, Inc.
  E.D. California· 1995-12-19· cited 72×
• Kuhn v. Account Control Technology, Inc.
  D. Nevada· 1994-10-18· cited 62×
• Huggins v. Graves
  Sixth Circuit· 1964-10-28· cited 33×
• Cavallaro v. Law Office of Shapiro & Kreisman
  E.D. New York· 1996-08-07· cited 31×
• People v. Duz-Mor Diagnostic Laboratory, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1998-12-11· cited 29×
• In Re \Agent Orange\ Product Liability Litigation. The Dow Chemical Company
  Second Circuit· 1987-04-21· cited 28×
• Cacace v. Lucas
  D. Connecticut· 1990-03-19· cited 27×
• Pittman v. JJ Mac Intyre Co. of Nevada, Inc.
  D. Nevada· 1997-03-24· cited 27×
• Irwin v. Mascott
  N.D. California· 1999-03-24· cited 26×
• Dale McCain v. Clearview Dodge Sales, Inc. v. Jefferson Bank and Trust Company, Third-Party
  Third Circuit· 1978-06-08· cited 22×
• Banks v. City of Emeryville
  N.D. California· 1985-08-27· cited 19×
• Barnett v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
  W.D. Oklahoma· 1978-06-30· cited 9×
• Crescent Wharf & Warehouse Co. v. Barracuda Tanker Corp.
  Ninth Circuit· 1983-01-11· cited 6×