Irwin v. Industrial Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging Finn's holding and stating that \we leave open for determination at a further time the question whether a truly unesplained fall ... arises out of employment and is compensable\ (emphasis added)
• level concrete floor not special hazard because it is a condition found in many non-employment locations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• City of Brighton v. Rodriguez
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2014-02-03· cited 121×
• Alexander v. D.L. Sitton Motor Lines
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1993-04-20· cited 65×
• In Re Quest. Sub. by US Ct. of Appeals
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1988-06-20· cited 32×
• Boice v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1990-07-26· cited 22×
• Stamper v. Hiteshew
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1990-04-12· cited 14×
• Tolbert v. Martin Marietta Corp.
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1988-06-20· cited 12×
• Gates Rubber Co. v. INDUSTRIAL COMM'N OF COLO.
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1985-05-16· cited 7×
• Rodriguez v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the State
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2012-08-16· cited 1×
• Featherstone v. Loomix, Inc.
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1986-08-14
• Morrison v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1988-04-21
• Hembry v. Industrial Claim Appeals office
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1994-06-16

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Deterts v. Times Publishing Company
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1976-06-10· cited 30×
• Velasquez v. Industrial Commission
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1978-06-29· cited 15×
• Kitchens v. Department of Labor & Employment
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1971-04-13· cited 8×