Irving v. E. Sondheimer Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[m]ore than mere conjecture is needed” to establish the “personal security” exemption under the RTKL
• finding .that the disclosure of the month and date of birth violates the “personal security” exception under the RTKL
• finding .that the disclosure of the month and date of birth violates the “personal security” exception under the RTKL
• finding .that the disclosure of the month and date of birth violates the “personal security” exception under the RTKL
• finding .that the disclosure of the month and date of birth violates the “personal security” exception under the RTKL
• stating more than mere conjecture is needed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).