Skip to main content
· 10/8/1884

Irving v. Cunningham

Citations

  • 66 Cal. 15
  • 4 P. 766
  • 1884 Cal. LEXIS 666

Syllabus

<p>Evidence—Written Contract—Reformation of Contract.—In an action at law, parol evidence is not admissible to contradict or vary the terms of a written contract. The instrument can be reformed or corrected so as to express the intention of the parties only by a court of equity in a proper action instituted for that purpose.</p> <p>Conveyance—Fads® Description.—Where the description in a deed of conveyance is false in some particulars, but a sufficient description remains after rejecting the part which is false, effect must be given to the deed.</p>

Judges: Sharpstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.