· 9/28/1992
Irving T. Schwartz v. United States of America, (Three Cases). United States of America v. Marvin Mandel, (Two Cases)
Citations
- 976 F.2d 213
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that there is no violation of due process when an order enforces a litigant's informed decision to settle and thereby to forego procedures designed to protect due process rights
- holding that there is no violation of due process when an order enforces a litigant’s informed decision to settle and thereby to forego procedures designed to protect due process rights
- holding judgment memorializing settlement agreement not prospective under Rule 60(b)(5) where all duties under agreement had been performed
- holding judgment memorializing settlement agreement not 5 prospective under Rule 60(b)(5) where all duties under agreement had been 6 performed
- refusing to overturn denial of relief under Rule 60(b) absent abuse of discretion
- refusing to overturn denial of relief under Rule 60(b) absent abuse of discretion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Russell, Widener, Hall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.