Irving M. Rubenstein, Also Known as Irving M. Ruby v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence of; Holmes v. United States, 284 F.2d 716 (4th Cir. 1960) (evidence of improper communication by court official to members of jury considered \newly discovered evidence\); United States v. Mitchell, 410 F. Supp. 1201 (D.D.C. 1976
• “There is no 24 controlling magic in the title, name, or description which a party 25 litigant gives to his pleading. The substance rather than the 26 name or denomination given to a pleading is the yardstick for 27 determining its character and sufficiency.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).