Irvine v. Wise

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding in case involving down-stream MRI providers that “[s]ince the defense of lack of medical necessity may indisputably be raised by the defendants [insurers] against the injured party, it is available as against radiologists who accept assignments of no-fault benefits”
• discussing the “defense of lack of medical necessity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).