· 6/29/1992
Irvin v. Jones
Citations
- 832 S.W.2d 827
- 310 Ark. 114
- 1992 Ark. LEXIS 447
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming summary judgment because plaintiffs presented no proof of delivery, an essential element of their claim that certificates of deposit were gifts inter vivos
- affirming summary judgment because plaintiffs presented no proof of delivery, an essential element of their claim that certificates of deposit were gifts inter vivos
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Corbin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.