Irvin v. Hood

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the father's consent to an adoption was not necessary because he had failed to provide support to the child for more than one year
• holding that father failed to provide care and support where he merely provided six items of clothing and some food during visitation over three years
• holding that the father's consent to an adoption was not necessary because he had failed to provide support to the child for more than one year
• holding that the parent’s consent to an adoption was not necessary because he had failed to provide support for the child for more than one year
• holding that the parent’s consent to an adoption was not necessary because he had failed to provide support for the child for more than one year
• holding that the father had failed to support his child despite fact that he provided six items of clothing for the child and some food during child’s visits with paternal grandparents

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).