Irrizary Carlo, Gilda N v. Clean Harbors Caribe, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that courts have jurisdiction and can grant declaratory relief
• explaining that “bare and self-serving” testimony does not create a genuine dispute of material fact where there is also strong, contradictory “circumstantial evidence”
• rejecting an affidavit when the assertions within it were “impeached by a well supported showing to the contrary”
• describing the Immigration Act of 1990’s effect on district court jurisdiction over naturalization applications
• “Affidavits and declarations considered on summary judgment must, ‘set out facts that would be admissible in evidence.’” (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c))
• “[D]istrict courts have jurisdiction to review a denial of naturalization during the pendency of removal proceedings and may issue a declaratory judgment regarding the lawfulness of such denial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).