Iron Workers Local No. 67 v. Hart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing the ICRA contains “[a]nalo-gous language” to Title VII and “is another manifestation of a massive national drive to right wrongs prevailing in our social and economic structures for more than a century”
• recognizing the ICRA contains “[a]nalogous language” to Title VII and “is another manifestation of a massive national drive to right wrongs prevailing in our social and economic structures for more than a century”
• recognizing the ICRA contains “[a]nalogous language” to Title VII and “is another manifestation of a massive national drive to right wrongs prevailing in our social and economic structures for more than a century”
• explaining “technical rules of pleading have no application in an administrative proceeding”
• explaining “technical rules of pleading have no application in an administrative proceeding”
• “The right granted [to the] Commission to allow back pay . . . is only incidental to affirmative action equitably decreed and cannot by analogy generate a power to enter judgment for other common law damages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).