Skip to main content
· 4/24/2006

Iron Workers Local 16 Pension Fund v. Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Co.

Citations

  • 432 F. Supp. 2d 571
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29460
  • 2006 WL 1117814

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting the Eastern District of Virginia often considers a claim futile after plaintiff has had two opportunities to plead it
  • considering documents submitted by defendant as attachments to motion to dismiss when those documents contained the allegedly misleading statements in securities fraud action
  • “In the Eastern District of Virginia, an amendment may be considered futile where [p]laintiffs have previously had two full opportunities to plead their claim.”
  • “In the Eastern District of Virginia, an amendment may be considered futile where [p]laintiffs have previously had two full opportunities to plead their claim.”
  • “group pleading is insufficient to plead with the particularity required by Rule 9(b)”
  • “[M]ere allegations amounting to fraud by hindsight are insufficient”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.