Irma H. Sydnor Vivian E. Wyatt v. Conseco Financial Servicing Corporation, and Aapcoof Richmond West, Incorporated

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “district court erred in finding that the arbitration agreement was unconscionable because of unknown cost, fees, and procedures”
• noting that unconscionability ruling in Hooters was based on \multitude of biased and warped rules\ and provided example of limited circumstances in which unconscionability finding was appropriate
• noting that unconscionability ruling in Hooters was based on \multitude of biased and warped rules\ and provided example of limited circumstances in which unconsciona- bility finding was appropriate
• employee unlikely to succeed on claim that his right to jury trial superseded arbitration clauses
• “[F]ailure of an arbitration agreement to address costs and fees does not alone make the agreement unenforceable.”
• “The FAA mandates that if parties execute a valid agreement to arbitrate disputes, a federal court must compel arbitration.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).