Irizarry v. Anker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that employer had provided a non-discriminatory reason for its decision to terminate plaintiff-buyer because “buyers no longer had any duties to perform, and the job of buyer was eliminated, a move motivated solely by economy.”
• finding that the ADEA “does not authorize the courts to judge the wisdom of a corporation’s business decisions.”
• “The Age Discrimination in Employment Act does not authorize the courts to judge the wisdom of a corporation’s business decisions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).