Irizarry Pérez v. Mitsubishi Motors Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a “notice of removal cannot be amended to add new bases for removal after the thirty- day removal period has run, nor can a defendant presént new grounds for removal for the first time in opposition to a motion ■ for remand”
• declining to consider new arguments raised in motion to remand briefing
• remanding action, in part because a “notice of removal cannot be amended to add new bases for removal after the thirty day removal period has run, nor can a defendant present new grounds for removal for the first time in opposition to a motion for remand”
• “The notice of removal cannot be amended to add new bases for removal after the thirty day removal period has run, nor can a defendant present new grounds for removal for the first time in opposition to a motion for remand.”
• “The notice of removal cannot be amended to add new bases for removal after the thirty day removal period has run, nor can a defendant present new grounds for removal for the first time in opposition to a motion for remand.”
• “The notice of removal cannot be amended to add new bases for removal after 14 the thirty day removal period has run, nor can a defendant present new grounds for removal for 15 the first time in opposition to a motion for remand.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).