Iris Vannette Bell v. Landing at Westchase Apartments

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the 1991 Act, which affects substantive rights, should be prospectively applied
• holding that Civil Rights Act of 1991 not retroactive
• noting that Senators Danforth and Kennedy expressed different views concerning retroactivity of Act
• recognizing distinction between affirmative action plans based on generalized discrimination in an industry versus discrimination by a city in hiring its own police force
• recognizing distinction between affirmative action plans based on generalized discrimination in an industry versus discrimination by a city in hiring its own police force
• holding, in the context of a pending case, \that the 1991 Act does not govern the instant case which involves conduct that occurred before the 1991 Act became law\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).