Ipsen v. Ruess

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the general rule as to relevancy is “ hvhether there is a logical or rational connection between the fact which is sought to be proved and a matter of fact which has been made an issue in the case ’ ” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).