· 4/10/2007
Ipsen v. Moxley
Citations
- 642 S.E.2d 798
- 49 Va. App. 555
- 2007 Va. App. LEXIS 142
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that a pendente lite order’s requirements remain in effect during the pendency of the divorce case
- noting that one statute should not be reviewed in isolation, but that the Code and its Titles should be interpreted as a unified whole
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Elizabeth A. McClanahan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.