Skip to main content
· 4/10/2007

Ipsen v. Moxley

Citations

  • 642 S.E.2d 798
  • 49 Va. App. 555
  • 2007 Va. App. LEXIS 142

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a pendente lite order’s requirements remain in effect during the pendency of the divorce case
  • noting that one statute should not be reviewed in isolation, but that the Code and its Titles should be interpreted as a unified whole

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elizabeth A. McClanahan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.