Ippolito v. Meisel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• treating “plaintiff's pro se complaint as attempting to bring claims against all defendants” where it was “unclear” which claims plaintiff intended to bring against which defendants
• characterizing a request for declaratory relief as “nothing more than a request for a declaration of a violation of federal law where there is no continuing violation to enjoin, and is thus barred against defendants” (citation and quotation marks omitted)
• “[C]ourts are not obliged to entertain actions for declaratory judgment not seeking prospective relief but merely declaring past wrongs.”
• no civil liability for violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1621
• judicial immunity for a town justice presiding over traffic tickets

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).