D. Colorado· 4/26/2011
I.P. Ex Rel. Cardenas v. Henneberry
Citations
- 795 F. Supp. 2d 1189
- 2011 WL 1584105
- 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45063
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that because the Medicaid recipient intended to remain on Medicaid, “any funds allocated for future medical expenses should rightfully be exposed to the state’s lien”
- concluding that the state agency “may seek reimbursement for its past medical expenses from funds allocated to ‘medical expenses,’ regardless of whether those funds are allocated for past or future medical expenses”
- concluding that the state agency “may seek reimbursement for its past medical expenses from funds allocated to ‘medical éxpenses,’ regardless of whether those funds are allocated for past or future medical expenses”
- “Because Plaintiff intends on staying on Medicaid, any funds allocated for future medical expenses should rightfully be exposed to the state’s lien so that the state can be reimbursed for its past medical payments.”
- “Because Plaintiff intends on staying on Medicaid, any funds allocated for future medical expenses should rightfully be exposed to the state’s lien so that the state can be reimbursed for its past medical payments.”
- “Because Plaintiff intends on staying on Medicaid, any funds allocated for future medical expenses should rightfully be exposed to the [S]tate’s lien so that the [S]tate can be reimbursed for its past medical payments.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Martínez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re E.B.West Virginia Supreme Court· 2012-06-21· cited 23×
- Gallardo ex rel. Vassallo v. DudekN.D. Florida· 2017-04-18· cited 9×
- Latham v. Recovery ServicesUtah Supreme Court· 2019-08-22· cited 8×
- Gianinna Gallardo v. Mary MayhewEleventh Circuit· 2020-06-26· cited 8×
- MARIA ISABEL GIRALDO and Juan Gonzalo Villa v. Agency For Health Care AdministrationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-12-12· cited 5×
- Willoughby v. Agency for Health Care AdministrationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-03-10· cited 4×
- Naccache v. TaylorDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2018-12-21· cited 3×
- State Department of Health Care Policy & Financing v. S.P.Colorado Court of Appeals· 2015-06-18· cited 2×
- Reyes v. HickenlooperD. Colorado· 2015-03-25· cited 2×
- Maurice F. Naccache v. Angela M. TaylorDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2018-12-27
- L.Q. v. Cal. Hospital Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2021-10-01
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court· 1985-06-28· cited 11,385×
- Wright Ex Rel. Trust Co. v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2001-08-06· cited 738×
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Farm Credit Bank of WichitaTenth Circuit· 2000-09-13· cited 598×
- Washington State Department of Social & Health Services v. Guardianship Estate of KeffelerSupreme Court· 2003-02-25· cited 422×
- Arkansas Department of Health & Human Services v. AhlbornSupreme Court· 2006-05-01· cited 286×
- Faustin v. City and CountyTenth Circuit· 2005-09-15· cited 234×
- McBeth v. HimesTenth Circuit· 2010-03-08· cited 139×
- I.M.A., Inc. v. Rocky Mountain Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado· 1986-01-13· cited 126×
- Price v. WolfordTenth Circuit· 2010-06-17· cited 88×
- In Re Ribozyme Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Securities LitigationD. Colorado· 2002-07-15· cited 70×
- Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. MateyIdaho Supreme Court· 2009-07-09· cited 14×
- In Re MateyIdaho Supreme Court· 2009-07-09· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.