I.P. Ex Rel. Cardenas v. Henneberry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that because the Medicaid recipient intended to remain on Medicaid, “any funds allocated for future medical expenses should rightfully be exposed to the state’s lien”
• concluding that the state agency “may seek reimbursement for its past medical expenses from funds allocated to ‘medical expenses,’ regardless of whether those funds are allocated for past or future medical expenses”
• concluding that the state agency “may seek reimbursement for its past medical expenses from funds allocated to ‘medical éxpenses,’ regardless of whether those funds are allocated for past or future medical expenses”
• “Because Plaintiff intends on staying on Medicaid, any funds allocated for future medical expenses should rightfully be exposed to the state’s lien so that the state can be reimbursed for its past medical payments.”
• “Because Plaintiff intends on staying on Medicaid, any funds allocated for future medical expenses should rightfully be exposed to the state’s lien so that the state can be reimbursed for its past medical payments.”
• “Because Plaintiff intends on staying on Medicaid, any funds allocated for future medical expenses should rightfully be exposed to the [S]tate’s lien so that the [S]tate can be reimbursed for its past medical payments.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).