Iowa Utilities Board v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that Congress did not intend rates to be based on the cost some imaginary ILEC would incur, but on the actual costs that ILECs incurred in sharing network elements
• according Chevron deference to FCC rate regulations promulgated pursuant to S 251(d)(1)
• \We are convinced that rules 51.315(c)-(f) must remain vacated.\
• “We are convinced that rules 51.315(c)-(f) must remain vacated.”
• reaffirming invalidation of Rules 315(c)-(f)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).