Skip to main content
· 9/17/1997

Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. Scheetz

Citations

  • 568 N.W.2d 663
  • 1997 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 240

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting \respondent's recognition of his limitations in the private practice field\ as evidenced by his subsequent employment in a government position in assessing the need for protection of the public
  • noting “respondent’s recognition of his limitations in the private practice field” as evidenced by his subsequent employment in a government position in assessing the need for protection of the public
  • public reprimand for two instances of client neglect and failure to cooperate with Board
  • public reprimand for two instances of client neglect and failure to cooperate with Board

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harris, Carter, Andreasen, Ternus, Schultz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.