Skip to main content
· 4/17/1996

Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. Plumb

Citations

  • 546 N.W.2d 215
  • 1996 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 237
  • 1996 WL 189968

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that false testimony to Commission “would be a proper consideration in determining the severity of any sanction”
  • “It is not the use of recording devices, but the employment of artifice or pretense, that truly poses a threat to the trust which is the bedrock of our professional relationships”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harris, Larson, Lavorato, Neuman, Snell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.