Skip to main content
· 4/3/2002

Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. Lane

Citations

  • 642 N.W.2d 296
  • 2002 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 45
  • 2002 WL 535414

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that attorney could not take eighty hours to copy material from a treatise into his brief
  • noting that attorney could not take eighty hours to copy material from a treatise into his brief
  • \Mitigating factors alone do not overcome our responsibility to the public or to the legal profession.\
  • noting, in imposing discipline, that respondent's conduct \jeopardized the integrity of the Bar and the public's trust in the legal profession\
  • noting, in imposing discipline, that respondent’s conduct “jeopardized the integrity of the Bar and the public’s trust in the legal profession”
  • imposing six-month license suspension when attorney requested excessive attorney fees for allegedly spending eighty hours to write a brief that he had plagiarized

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Streit

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.