Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. Hohenadel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing a previous reprimand was an aggravating circumstance “warranting more severe discipline”
• recognizing a previous reprimand was an aggravating circumstance “warranting more severe discipline”
• noting “harm to a client is an aggravating circumstance that warrants a more serious sanction”
• imposing four-month suspension for attorney with history of unethical conduct who engaged in conduct involving misrepresentation and neglect resulting in harm to the attorney’s clients
• finding an attorney’s neglect of two clients’ legal matters as well as his misrepresentations to the court and his clients as to the status of those matters- warranted a four-month suspension
• noting as a mitigating circumstance that lawyer’s unethical conduct was not the product of a dishonest character

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).