Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. D.J.I.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• barring an attorney from relitigat-ing the issues of fraud and misrepresentation, among other issues, in a disciplinary case under the doctrine of issue preclusion
• barring an attorney from relitigating the issues of fraud and misrepresentation, among other issues, in a disciplinary case under the doctrine of issue preclusion
• observing under the former version of rule 35.7(3), rule 118.7, that issue preclusion “may be used by either party in a lawyer discipline case”
• holding our court rule, then rule 118.7, applies retroactively
• “In deciding whether to apply issue preclusion in subsequent litigation, the focus is on what issues were actually decided in the prior litigation and what issues a party in subsequent litigation seeks to have precluded.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).