Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Reuben Andrew Neff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “an opportunity to be heard does not require an oral or evidentiary hearing on the issue” of attorney discipline (citation omitted)
• “We will reverse a district court’s factual findings as to whether an attorney acted recklessly or in bad faith only if they are clearly erroneous.”
• “an opportunity to be heard does not require an oral or evidentiary hearing on the 7 issue…[t]he opportunity to brief the issue fully satisfies due process requirements”
• opportunity to brief issue satisfies due process requirements
• reviewing for abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).