Skip to main content
· 3/21/2008

Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Rauch

Citations

  • 746 N.W.2d 262
  • 2008 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 46
  • 2008 WL 747079

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting “ghostwriting” for a pro se party could be considered practicing law
  • noting “ghostwriting” for a pro se party could be considered practicing law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Streit

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.